Table 2 shows the frequency of subjects resorting to various activities to ward off loneliness
Activity
Frequency
Percentage
Religion
20 33.3%
Hobbies
22 36.6%
Social Activities
18 30%
X2(2) = 0.4; NS
There were no significant gender differences found towards the perception of loneliness.
The results in Table 1 show that chi-square value for 2df is significant below 0.01 level of confidence which confirms the first hypothesis.
The chi-square value also indicates that perception of loneliness in terms of positive, negative, and mixed qualities in not equally distributed.
As mentioned earlier the examination of the literature of loneliness shows that being alone and being lonely are not coincident, but many subjects in this study treated loneliness as synonymous with aloneness hence in this research loneliness is treated on par with being alone.
Table 1 indicated that about 58% of the elderly perceive loneliness negatively (negative aloneness) this is in accordance with the findings of previous researches on loneliness which have indicated that majority of the elderly perceived loneliness as an unwanted situation (e.g. , Seligman, 1975; Weiss, 1973; etc).
These findings are also supported by prior findings of Bowling et al (1989) who examined factor related to loneliness in 590 female and 60 male elderly (aged 85+ years) and stated that loneliness is undesirable because it arises due to increased physical impairment, small social network, increased psychiatric morbidity and lack of confidante.
This result also indicates that about 25% of the elderly perceive loneliness positively (positive aloneness), a condition whereby the elderly avoids contacts with others and prefer to be in contact with one's own self mainly due to the stereotypes and prejudices present in the society regarding oldage.
Table 1 also points out that nearly 17% of the elderly have mixed perception towards loneliness which is due to vague or unclear views regarding the experience of loneliness.
The results of Table 2 indicate the chi-square value for 2df is not significant which states all the three major activities, namely, religion, hobbies, and social activities are equally spread among the elderly population to ward off loneliness. The present finding does not confirm the second hypothesis which states that “religion appear as the major activity to resolve loneliness among the elderly.”
This finding is supported by the earlier research by Kivett (1979) who investigated religion as motivating factor among 301 elderly persons and found that elderly with high idealized self-concept and adults believing more in personal control are less likely to be motivated by religion.
Querry and Steins (1974) found that religion optimism decreased with age.
Generally, loneliness is viewed more of a social phenomena, hobbies tend to predominate the leisure time activities in later life play an important role.
Normally elderly people resolve loneliness by means of social activities and hobbies such as gardening, fishing, reading, etc. along with religious activities.
Hence this study indicates that all three major activities are equally spread to ward off loneliness among elderly.
REFERENCES
Baum, S.K.: Loneliness in elderly persons: A preliminary study. Psychological Reports, 50: 1317-1318, 1982.
Bowling, A.P., Edlemann, R.J., Leaver and Hockel, T.: Loneliness, mobility, well-being and social support in a sample of over 85 years olds. Personality and Independent Differences, 10(11), 1989.
Ellison, C.W.: Loneliness: A social development analysis. Journal of Psychology and Theology. 6: 3-17, 1978.
Hartog, J; Audy, J.R and Cohen, Y.A. (eds.): The anatomy of loneliness. New York: International Universities Press, 1980.
Kivett, V.R.: Religious motivation in middle age: Correlates and implications. Journal of Gerontology, 34(1): 106-115, 1979.
Natale, S.M.: Loneliness and the aging client: Psychotherapeutic consideration. In S.M. Natale (eds.). Psychotherapy and the lonely patient. New York: Howorts, 77-94, 1986.
Peplau, L.A and Perlman, D.: Loneliness: A source book of current theory, research and therapy. New York: John Wiley. 1982.
Polansky, N.A.: Determinants of loneliness among neglectful and other low-income mothers. Journal of Social Service Researches. 8: 1-15, 1985.
Querry, J.M and Steins, M.: Disillusionment, health status and age: A study of value differences of mid-western women. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 5(3): 245-256,1974.
Rubenstein, C.M., Shaver, P and Peplau, L.A.: Loneliness. New York: New York University Press, 1979.
Russell, D.W., Peplau, L.A and Cutrona, C.E.: The Revised UCLA Loneliness Scale: Concurrent and discriminate validity evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39: 472-480, 1980.
Sadler, W.A and Johnson, T.R.: From loneliness to anomie. In: Hartog, J.R., Audy and Cohen, Y.A. (eds.). The anatomy of loneliness, New York: International Universities Press, 1980.
Schultz, N.R. Jr and Moore, D.: Loneliness: Correlates attributes and coping among the older adults . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin Co., 67-77, 1984.
Seligman, M.E.P.: Helplessness: On depression, development and death. San Francisco: W.H. Freman, 1975.
Walten, C.G., Schultz, C.M., Beck, C.M. and Walls, R.C.: Psychological correlates of loneliness in the older adults. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 5(3): 65-77,1991.
Weiss, R.S.: Loneliness: The experience of emotional and social isolation. Cambridge: MA: MIT Press, 1973.
Weiss, R.S.: Reflection on the present state of loneliness research. In: M. Hojat and R. Crandall (eds.). (Special issue). Loneliness: Theory, research and applications. Journal of Social Psychology, 2: 1-16, 1987.
Young, J.E.: Loneliness, depression and cognitive therapy. In: L.A. Peplau and Perlman, D (eds.). Loneliness: A source book of current theory, research and therapy. New York: Wiley Interscience, 379-405, 1982.
Article Source: http://www.articlesbase.com/psychology-articles/elderly-perception-of-loneliness-and-ways-of-resolving-it-403625.html